id summary reporter owner description type status priority milestone component version resolution keywords cc launchpad_bug 804 provide binary .egg's for pycryptopp for all supported platforms and versions of Python arch_o_median zooko "= Some System Configuration Information = {{{ arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe$ darcs --version 2.0.2 (release) arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe$ uname -a Linux showertimedepot 2.6.18.8-x86_64-linode7 #1 SMP Fri Aug 14 17:14:08 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe$ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description: Ubuntu 8.10 Release: 8.10 Codename: intrepid }}} = Downloads = Per [http://allmydata.org/trac/tahoe/wiki/Dev these] instructions I ran: {{{ darcs get --lazy http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/trunk-hashedformat tahoe }}} I've deviated from the prescribed protocol since the default install docs do not recommend acquiring the source from the darcs repo. [[BR]] Perhaps differences between the tarball and the repo versions generate this bug. [[BR]] To check this I also attempt to build from the tarball in a separate location. I.E. I ran: {{{ wget http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/releases/allmydata-tahoe-1.5.0.zip }}} = Build From Repo = Per [http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/trunk/docs/install.html these] instructions I ran: {{{ ~/tahoe$ python ./setup.py build &> from_repo_build_log.txt }}} in the ""from-repo"" directory. Upon inspection of the output (attached) I see several error-types. [[BR]] I guess these two to be not-fatal: [[BR]] i. ""darcs failed: Not a repository: ..."" and [[BR]] i. ""cc1plus: warning:..."" lines are not fatal. [[BR]] Following those two error-types the next error is: {{{ pycryptopp/_pycryptoppmodule.cpp:2:20: error: Python.h: No such file or directory }}} = Difference Between First and Second Build Attempts in From-Tarball Version = In the ""from-tar"" directory I ran: {{{ python ./setup.py build &> from_tar_build_log_initial.txt }}} (Actually I changed the log names to be more descriptive, after the fact.) I do not notice obvious differences between repo and tar. [[BR]] I do notice differences between initial and subsequent build-attempts. [[BR]] (Perhaps I should be writing ""setup-"" vice ""build-"" attempts.) {{{ arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe/allmydata-tahoe-1.5.0$ grep zope from_tar_build_log_initial.txt | grep Python.h src/zope/interface/_zope_interface_coptimizations.c:15:20: error: Python.h: No such file or directory arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe/allmydata-tahoe-1.5.0$ grep zope from_tar_build_log_second.txt | grep Python.h }}} (Log names changed after the fact for clarity.) Intriguingly ""zope"" appears to be missing ""Python.h"" on the first build attempt, this is not reported on subsequent build attempts.[[BR]] The missing Python.h in pycryptopp is reported in initial and subsequent build attempts: {{{ arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe/allmydata-tahoe-1.5.0$ grep pycryp from_tar_build_log_initial.txt | grep Python.h pycryptopp/_pycryptoppmodule.cpp:2:20: error: Python.h: No such file or directory arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe/allmydata-tahoe-1.5.0$ grep pycryp from_tar_build_log_second.txt | grep Python.h pycryptopp/_pycryptoppmodule.cpp:2:20: error: Python.h: No such file or directory }}} = First Versus Second From Repo Setup = Is the difference between initial and subsequent setup bugs also [[BR]] seen in the from repo version? To find out I tested a fresh from-repo setup attempt. {{{ arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe-darcs$ darcs get --lazy http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/trunk-hashedformat tahoe Finished getting. }}} {{{ arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe-darcs/tahoe$ grep -iEe""zope|pycryp"" | grep Python.h from_repo_* from_repo_initial_setup.txt:src/zope/interface/_zope_interface_coptimizations.c:15:20: error: Python.h: No such file or directory from_repo_initial_setup.txt:pycryptopp/_pycryptoppmodule.cpp:2:20: error: Python.h: No such file or directory from_repo_second_setup.txt:pycryptopp/_pycryptoppmodule.cpp:2:20: error: Python.h: No such file or directory }}} So the difference between zope and pycryptopp initial vs. [[BR]] second installs generalizes to installs from tar and from repo. = Bug Interpretation = It looks like Python.h of pycryptopp is not found so I guess that I lack some necessary dependency. = Calling All Dependencies = (Since my bug does not seem to vary between from-repo and from-tar, I stick to from repo from here on.) Where're these elusive Python.h's? Sound like C headers to me.... Naive: {{{ arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe-darcs/tahoe$ find . -iname ""*Python.h*"" arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe-darcs/tahoe$ }}} OK, not surprising since docs say all repo is python, and what's missing is C. So, my belief that I have a dependency problem grows stronger. Following [http://allmydata.org/source/tahoe/trunk/docs/install.html More Details], I learn that I can view ""the canonical list of dependencies"" in _auto_deps.py. Of course, I cannot run ""tahoe --version"" yet so I skip that advice... Aha! A ""complete list of all dependencies..."" {{{ PYTHONPATH=${PYTHONPATH}:./support/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ python -c ""import pkg_resources;print ', '.join([d.project_name+': '+d.version for d in set(pkg_resources.require('allmydata-tahoe'))])"" }}} {{{ arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe-darcs/tahoe$ PYTHONPATH=${PYTHONPATH}:./support/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ python -c ""import pkg_resources;print ', '.join([d.project_name+': '+d.version for d in set(pkg_resources.require('allmydata-tahoe'))])"" Traceback (most recent call last): File """", line 1, in File ""/home/arc/tahoe-darcs/tahoe/support/lib/python2.5/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev.egg/pkg_resources.py"", line 626, in require needed = self.resolve(parse_requirements(requirements)) File ""/home/arc/tahoe-darcs/tahoe/support/lib/python2.5/site-packages/setuptools-0.6c12dev.egg/pkg_resources.py"", line 524, in resolve raise DistributionNotFound(req) # XXX put more info here pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: pycryptopp>=0.5.15 arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe-darcs/tahoe$ }}} Hmmm.... next step... submit and wait... if no help then dissect above expression... OK, I did try to dissect a tiny bit: In ipython interpreter: {{{ In [1]: import sys In [2]: sys.path Out[2]: ['', '/usr/bin', '/usr/lib/python2.5', '/usr/lib/python2.5/plat-linux2', '/usr/lib/python2.5/lib-tk', '/usr/lib/python2.5/lib-dynload', '/usr/local/lib/python2.5/site-packages', '/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages', '/var/lib/python-support/python2.5', '/var/lib/python-support/python2.5/IPython/Extensions', '/home/arc/.ipython'] In [3]: sys.path.append('./support/lib/python2.5/site-packages/') In [4]: import pkg_resources --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ImportError Traceback (most recent call last) /home/arc/tahoe-darcs/tahoe/ in () ImportError: No module named pkg_resources }}} (And just to be sure I tried above with explicit path name from root to relevant site-packages.) Which is: {{{ arc@showertimedepot:~/tahoe-darcs/tahoe$ ls -la ./support/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ total 32 drwxr-xr-x 3 arc arc 4096 2009-09-14 22:32 . drwxr-xr-x 3 arc arc 4096 2009-09-14 22:30 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 arc arc 35 2009-09-14 22:32 allmydata-tahoe.egg-link -rw-r--r-- 1 arc arc 297 2009-09-14 22:30 easy-install.pth drwxr-xr-x 4 arc arc 4096 2009-09-14 22:32 setuptools-0.6c12dev.egg -rw-r--r-- 1 arc arc 27 2009-09-14 22:32 setuptools.pth -rw-r--r-- 1 arc arc 2327 2009-09-14 22:30 site.py -rw-r--r-- 1 arc arc 1833 2009-09-14 22:30 site.pyc }}}" defect closed minor 1.8.1 packaging 1.5.0 fixed binaries install dependency pycryptopp linux x86-64