| 1 | """ |
|---|
| 2 | Ported to Python 3. |
|---|
| 3 | """ |
|---|
| 4 | |
|---|
| 5 | from ..common import AsyncTestCase |
|---|
| 6 | from testtools.matchers import Equals, HasLength |
|---|
| 7 | from allmydata.interfaces import IRepairResults, ICheckAndRepairResults |
|---|
| 8 | from allmydata.monitor import Monitor |
|---|
| 9 | from allmydata.mutable.common import MODE_CHECK |
|---|
| 10 | from allmydata.mutable.layout import unpack_header |
|---|
| 11 | from allmydata.mutable.repairer import MustForceRepairError |
|---|
| 12 | from ..common import ShouldFailMixin |
|---|
| 13 | from .util import PublishMixin |
|---|
| 14 | |
|---|
| 15 | class Repair(AsyncTestCase, PublishMixin, ShouldFailMixin): |
|---|
| 16 | |
|---|
| 17 | def get_shares(self, s): |
|---|
| 18 | all_shares = {} # maps (peerid, shnum) to share data |
|---|
| 19 | for peerid in s._peers: |
|---|
| 20 | shares = s._peers[peerid] |
|---|
| 21 | for shnum in shares: |
|---|
| 22 | data = shares[shnum] |
|---|
| 23 | all_shares[ (peerid, shnum) ] = data |
|---|
| 24 | return all_shares |
|---|
| 25 | |
|---|
| 26 | def copy_shares(self, ignored=None): |
|---|
| 27 | self.old_shares.append(self.get_shares(self._storage)) |
|---|
| 28 | |
|---|
| 29 | def test_repair_nop(self): |
|---|
| 30 | self.old_shares = [] |
|---|
| 31 | d = self.publish_one() |
|---|
| 32 | d.addCallback(self.copy_shares) |
|---|
| 33 | d.addCallback(lambda res: self._fn.check(Monitor())) |
|---|
| 34 | d.addCallback(lambda check_results: self._fn.repair(check_results)) |
|---|
| 35 | def _check_results(rres): |
|---|
| 36 | self.assertThat(IRepairResults.providedBy(rres), Equals(True)) |
|---|
| 37 | self.assertThat(rres.get_successful(), Equals(True)) |
|---|
| 38 | # TODO: examine results |
|---|
| 39 | |
|---|
| 40 | self.copy_shares() |
|---|
| 41 | |
|---|
| 42 | initial_shares = self.old_shares[0] |
|---|
| 43 | new_shares = self.old_shares[1] |
|---|
| 44 | # TODO: this really shouldn't change anything. When we implement |
|---|
| 45 | # a "minimal-bandwidth" repairer", change this test to assert: |
|---|
| 46 | #self.assertThat(new_shares, Equals(initial_shares)) |
|---|
| 47 | |
|---|
| 48 | # all shares should be in the same place as before |
|---|
| 49 | self.assertThat(set(initial_shares.keys()), |
|---|
| 50 | Equals(set(new_shares.keys()))) |
|---|
| 51 | # but they should all be at a newer seqnum. The IV will be |
|---|
| 52 | # different, so the roothash will be too. |
|---|
| 53 | for key in initial_shares: |
|---|
| 54 | (version0, |
|---|
| 55 | seqnum0, |
|---|
| 56 | root_hash0, |
|---|
| 57 | IV0, |
|---|
| 58 | k0, N0, segsize0, datalen0, |
|---|
| 59 | o0) = unpack_header(initial_shares[key]) |
|---|
| 60 | (version1, |
|---|
| 61 | seqnum1, |
|---|
| 62 | root_hash1, |
|---|
| 63 | IV1, |
|---|
| 64 | k1, N1, segsize1, datalen1, |
|---|
| 65 | o1) = unpack_header(new_shares[key]) |
|---|
| 66 | self.assertThat(version0, Equals(version1)) |
|---|
| 67 | self.assertThat(seqnum0+1, Equals(seqnum1)) |
|---|
| 68 | self.assertThat(k0, Equals(k1)) |
|---|
| 69 | self.assertThat(N0, Equals(N1)) |
|---|
| 70 | self.assertThat(segsize0, Equals(segsize1)) |
|---|
| 71 | self.assertThat(datalen0, Equals(datalen1)) |
|---|
| 72 | d.addCallback(_check_results) |
|---|
| 73 | return d |
|---|
| 74 | |
|---|
| 75 | def failIfSharesChanged(self, ignored=None): |
|---|
| 76 | old_shares = self.old_shares[-2] |
|---|
| 77 | current_shares = self.old_shares[-1] |
|---|
| 78 | self.assertThat(old_shares, Equals(current_shares)) |
|---|
| 79 | |
|---|
| 80 | |
|---|
| 81 | def _test_whether_repairable(self, publisher, nshares, expected_result): |
|---|
| 82 | d = publisher() |
|---|
| 83 | def _delete_some_shares(ign): |
|---|
| 84 | shares = self._storage._peers |
|---|
| 85 | for peerid in shares: |
|---|
| 86 | for shnum in list(shares[peerid]): |
|---|
| 87 | if shnum >= nshares: |
|---|
| 88 | del shares[peerid][shnum] |
|---|
| 89 | d.addCallback(_delete_some_shares) |
|---|
| 90 | d.addCallback(lambda ign: self._fn.check(Monitor())) |
|---|
| 91 | def _check(cr): |
|---|
| 92 | self.assertThat(cr.is_healthy(), Equals(False)) |
|---|
| 93 | self.assertThat(cr.is_recoverable(), Equals(expected_result)) |
|---|
| 94 | return cr |
|---|
| 95 | d.addCallback(_check) |
|---|
| 96 | d.addCallback(lambda check_results: self._fn.repair(check_results)) |
|---|
| 97 | d.addCallback(lambda crr: self.assertThat(crr.get_successful(), Equals(expected_result))) |
|---|
| 98 | return d |
|---|
| 99 | |
|---|
| 100 | def test_unrepairable_0shares(self): |
|---|
| 101 | return self._test_whether_repairable(self.publish_one, 0, False) |
|---|
| 102 | |
|---|
| 103 | def test_mdmf_unrepairable_0shares(self): |
|---|
| 104 | return self._test_whether_repairable(self.publish_mdmf, 0, False) |
|---|
| 105 | |
|---|
| 106 | def test_unrepairable_1share(self): |
|---|
| 107 | return self._test_whether_repairable(self.publish_one, 1, False) |
|---|
| 108 | |
|---|
| 109 | def test_mdmf_unrepairable_1share(self): |
|---|
| 110 | return self._test_whether_repairable(self.publish_mdmf, 1, False) |
|---|
| 111 | |
|---|
| 112 | def test_repairable_5shares(self): |
|---|
| 113 | return self._test_whether_repairable(self.publish_one, 5, True) |
|---|
| 114 | |
|---|
| 115 | def test_mdmf_repairable_5shares(self): |
|---|
| 116 | return self._test_whether_repairable(self.publish_mdmf, 5, True) |
|---|
| 117 | |
|---|
| 118 | def _test_whether_checkandrepairable(self, publisher, nshares, expected_result): |
|---|
| 119 | """ |
|---|
| 120 | Like the _test_whether_repairable tests, but invoking check_and_repair |
|---|
| 121 | instead of invoking check and then invoking repair. |
|---|
| 122 | """ |
|---|
| 123 | d = publisher() |
|---|
| 124 | def _delete_some_shares(ign): |
|---|
| 125 | shares = self._storage._peers |
|---|
| 126 | for peerid in shares: |
|---|
| 127 | for shnum in list(shares[peerid]): |
|---|
| 128 | if shnum >= nshares: |
|---|
| 129 | del shares[peerid][shnum] |
|---|
| 130 | d.addCallback(_delete_some_shares) |
|---|
| 131 | d.addCallback(lambda ign: self._fn.check_and_repair(Monitor())) |
|---|
| 132 | d.addCallback(lambda crr: self.assertThat(crr.get_repair_successful(), Equals(expected_result))) |
|---|
| 133 | return d |
|---|
| 134 | |
|---|
| 135 | def test_unrepairable_0shares_checkandrepair(self): |
|---|
| 136 | return self._test_whether_checkandrepairable(self.publish_one, 0, False) |
|---|
| 137 | |
|---|
| 138 | def test_mdmf_unrepairable_0shares_checkandrepair(self): |
|---|
| 139 | return self._test_whether_checkandrepairable(self.publish_mdmf, 0, False) |
|---|
| 140 | |
|---|
| 141 | def test_unrepairable_1share_checkandrepair(self): |
|---|
| 142 | return self._test_whether_checkandrepairable(self.publish_one, 1, False) |
|---|
| 143 | |
|---|
| 144 | def test_mdmf_unrepairable_1share_checkandrepair(self): |
|---|
| 145 | return self._test_whether_checkandrepairable(self.publish_mdmf, 1, False) |
|---|
| 146 | |
|---|
| 147 | def test_repairable_5shares_checkandrepair(self): |
|---|
| 148 | return self._test_whether_checkandrepairable(self.publish_one, 5, True) |
|---|
| 149 | |
|---|
| 150 | def test_mdmf_repairable_5shares_checkandrepair(self): |
|---|
| 151 | return self._test_whether_checkandrepairable(self.publish_mdmf, 5, True) |
|---|
| 152 | |
|---|
| 153 | |
|---|
| 154 | def test_merge(self): |
|---|
| 155 | self.old_shares = [] |
|---|
| 156 | d = self.publish_multiple() |
|---|
| 157 | # repair will refuse to merge multiple highest seqnums unless you |
|---|
| 158 | # pass force=True |
|---|
| 159 | d.addCallback(lambda res: |
|---|
| 160 | self._set_versions({0:3,2:3,4:3,6:3,8:3, |
|---|
| 161 | 1:4,3:4,5:4,7:4,9:4})) |
|---|
| 162 | d.addCallback(self.copy_shares) |
|---|
| 163 | d.addCallback(lambda res: self._fn.check(Monitor())) |
|---|
| 164 | def _try_repair(check_results): |
|---|
| 165 | ex = "There were multiple recoverable versions with identical seqnums, so force=True must be passed to the repair() operation" |
|---|
| 166 | d2 = self.shouldFail(MustForceRepairError, "test_merge", ex, |
|---|
| 167 | self._fn.repair, check_results) |
|---|
| 168 | d2.addCallback(self.copy_shares) |
|---|
| 169 | d2.addCallback(self.failIfSharesChanged) |
|---|
| 170 | d2.addCallback(lambda res: check_results) |
|---|
| 171 | return d2 |
|---|
| 172 | d.addCallback(_try_repair) |
|---|
| 173 | d.addCallback(lambda check_results: |
|---|
| 174 | self._fn.repair(check_results, force=True)) |
|---|
| 175 | # this should give us 10 shares of the highest roothash |
|---|
| 176 | def _check_repair_results(rres): |
|---|
| 177 | self.assertThat(rres.get_successful(), Equals(True)) |
|---|
| 178 | pass # TODO |
|---|
| 179 | d.addCallback(_check_repair_results) |
|---|
| 180 | d.addCallback(lambda res: self._fn.get_servermap(MODE_CHECK)) |
|---|
| 181 | def _check_smap(smap): |
|---|
| 182 | self.assertThat(smap.recoverable_versions(), HasLength(1)) |
|---|
| 183 | self.assertThat(smap.unrecoverable_versions(), HasLength(0)) |
|---|
| 184 | # now, which should have won? |
|---|
| 185 | roothash_s4a = self.get_roothash_for(3) |
|---|
| 186 | roothash_s4b = self.get_roothash_for(4) |
|---|
| 187 | if roothash_s4b > roothash_s4a: |
|---|
| 188 | expected_contents = self.CONTENTS[4] |
|---|
| 189 | else: |
|---|
| 190 | expected_contents = self.CONTENTS[3] |
|---|
| 191 | new_versionid = smap.best_recoverable_version() |
|---|
| 192 | self.assertThat(new_versionid[0], Equals(5)) # seqnum 5 |
|---|
| 193 | d2 = self._fn.download_version(smap, new_versionid) |
|---|
| 194 | d2.addCallback(self.assertEqual, expected_contents) |
|---|
| 195 | return d2 |
|---|
| 196 | d.addCallback(_check_smap) |
|---|
| 197 | return d |
|---|
| 198 | |
|---|
| 199 | def test_non_merge(self): |
|---|
| 200 | self.old_shares = [] |
|---|
| 201 | d = self.publish_multiple() |
|---|
| 202 | # repair should not refuse a repair that doesn't need to merge. In |
|---|
| 203 | # this case, we combine v2 with v3. The repair should ignore v2 and |
|---|
| 204 | # copy v3 into a new v5. |
|---|
| 205 | d.addCallback(lambda res: |
|---|
| 206 | self._set_versions({0:2,2:2,4:2,6:2,8:2, |
|---|
| 207 | 1:3,3:3,5:3,7:3,9:3})) |
|---|
| 208 | d.addCallback(lambda res: self._fn.check(Monitor())) |
|---|
| 209 | d.addCallback(lambda check_results: self._fn.repair(check_results)) |
|---|
| 210 | # this should give us 10 shares of v3 |
|---|
| 211 | def _check_repair_results(rres): |
|---|
| 212 | self.assertThat(rres.get_successful(), Equals(True)) |
|---|
| 213 | pass # TODO |
|---|
| 214 | d.addCallback(_check_repair_results) |
|---|
| 215 | d.addCallback(lambda res: self._fn.get_servermap(MODE_CHECK)) |
|---|
| 216 | def _check_smap(smap): |
|---|
| 217 | self.assertThat(smap.recoverable_versions(), HasLength(1)) |
|---|
| 218 | self.assertThat(smap.unrecoverable_versions(), HasLength(0)) |
|---|
| 219 | # now, which should have won? |
|---|
| 220 | expected_contents = self.CONTENTS[3] |
|---|
| 221 | new_versionid = smap.best_recoverable_version() |
|---|
| 222 | self.assertThat(new_versionid[0], Equals(5)) # seqnum 5 |
|---|
| 223 | d2 = self._fn.download_version(smap, new_versionid) |
|---|
| 224 | d2.addCallback(self.assertEqual, expected_contents) |
|---|
| 225 | return d2 |
|---|
| 226 | d.addCallback(_check_smap) |
|---|
| 227 | return d |
|---|
| 228 | |
|---|
| 229 | def get_roothash_for(self, index): |
|---|
| 230 | # return the roothash for the first share we see in the saved set |
|---|
| 231 | shares = self._copied_shares[index] |
|---|
| 232 | for peerid in shares: |
|---|
| 233 | for shnum in shares[peerid]: |
|---|
| 234 | share = shares[peerid][shnum] |
|---|
| 235 | (version, seqnum, root_hash, IV, k, N, segsize, datalen, o) = \ |
|---|
| 236 | unpack_header(share) |
|---|
| 237 | return root_hash |
|---|
| 238 | |
|---|
| 239 | def test_check_and_repair_readcap(self): |
|---|
| 240 | # we can't currently repair from a mutable readcap: #625 |
|---|
| 241 | self.old_shares = [] |
|---|
| 242 | d = self.publish_one() |
|---|
| 243 | d.addCallback(self.copy_shares) |
|---|
| 244 | def _get_readcap(res): |
|---|
| 245 | self._fn3 = self._fn.get_readonly() |
|---|
| 246 | # also delete some shares |
|---|
| 247 | for peerid,shares in list(self._storage._peers.items()): |
|---|
| 248 | shares.pop(0, None) |
|---|
| 249 | d.addCallback(_get_readcap) |
|---|
| 250 | d.addCallback(lambda res: self._fn3.check_and_repair(Monitor())) |
|---|
| 251 | def _check_results(crr): |
|---|
| 252 | self.assertThat(ICheckAndRepairResults.providedBy(crr), Equals(True)) |
|---|
| 253 | # we should detect the unhealthy, but skip over mutable-readcap |
|---|
| 254 | # repairs until #625 is fixed |
|---|
| 255 | self.assertThat(crr.get_pre_repair_results().is_healthy(), Equals(False)) |
|---|
| 256 | self.assertThat(crr.get_repair_attempted(), Equals(False)) |
|---|
| 257 | self.assertThat(crr.get_post_repair_results().is_healthy(), Equals(False)) |
|---|
| 258 | d.addCallback(_check_results) |
|---|
| 259 | return d |
|---|
| 260 | |
|---|
| 261 | def test_repair_empty(self): |
|---|
| 262 | # bug 1689: delete one share of an empty mutable file, then repair. |
|---|
| 263 | # In the buggy version, the check that precedes the retrieve+publish |
|---|
| 264 | # cycle uses MODE_READ, instead of MODE_REPAIR, and fails to get the |
|---|
| 265 | # privkey that repair needs. |
|---|
| 266 | d = self.publish_sdmf(b"") |
|---|
| 267 | def _delete_one_share(ign): |
|---|
| 268 | shares = self._storage._peers |
|---|
| 269 | for peerid in shares: |
|---|
| 270 | for shnum in list(shares[peerid]): |
|---|
| 271 | if shnum == 0: |
|---|
| 272 | del shares[peerid][shnum] |
|---|
| 273 | d.addCallback(_delete_one_share) |
|---|
| 274 | d.addCallback(lambda ign: self._fn2.check(Monitor())) |
|---|
| 275 | d.addCallback(lambda check_results: self._fn2.repair(check_results)) |
|---|
| 276 | def _check(crr): |
|---|
| 277 | self.assertThat(crr.get_successful(), Equals(True)) |
|---|
| 278 | d.addCallback(_check) |
|---|
| 279 | return d |
|---|